Better not get sick at Netflix !

This post is more than 2 years overdue, but I felt that my story needed to be heard, especially by past, current and prospective Netflix employees, as well as management.

In the summer of 2006, I was looking for a new position and ended up interviewing and landing what I thought was a great opportunity at Netflix working on security in the Electronic Delivery Systems group, and with a hefty paycheck. My first day was October 31, 2006.

Unfortunately, on November 1, my second day there, I got very bad news from my physician : my HIV test, performed the week before, had turned positive. This was of course devastating news. I became severely depressed, and was not able to make it to work on my third or fourth day. I missed plenty more work time. My boyfriend also turned out HIV positive 2 weeks after I did. I will be the first to admit that I was completely ineffective at my job for the next 2 months. Learning both about this new major disease and a new very challenging job at the same time simply was more than I could chew.

Finally, in January of 2007, I went on short-term disability for the depression and ended up in IOP at Kaiser. I was covered under Netflix's generous disability policies. After 1 month, I had still not been released back to work, and received a letter with an ultimatum to return to work by mid-february, 6 weeks after the start of my disability, or be terminated.

Unfortunately, I was ineligible for an FMLA, a Family Medical Leave of Absence, which would have allowed me to take 3 months medical leave, because I was a recent hire, and the law only covers those with at least 1 year of service.

One week before the ultimatum, I pleaded my case with Netflix HR, explaining the reason for my absenteism and disability. This did not make any difference. I was told that it was standard company policy for this situation - to terminate the new employee who had an extended illness ! The date passed, and I was terminated while still on disability. That was the first and only time I had ever been involuntarily terminated. No severance of any kind was offered. I was now both HIV positive, and jobless.

I was released by my doctor to work again about a month after my termination, and returned to my previous employer, Sun Microsystems, another month later, working 60% (3 days a week) for the remainder of 2007, and then back to full time in 2008.

As I write this post, I am enjoying some much-needed time off, having left Sun out of disinterest in September in the wake of the acquisition of Sun by Oracle, and seeking another opportunity. Few Silicon Valley companies are hiring at this time. But I noticed that Netflix was, and my old position still had not been filled. I inquired with my former manager at Netflix, who was aware of the details of the situation. I was told that per Netflix company policy, there are no second chances there - once you are fired from Netflix, you can never apply there again.

The moral of the story is this : make sure you don't get seriously sick if you want to work for Netflix, especially in your first year.

Murder by the state : people with HIV to be terminated in California

The governator's proposed California budget includes $55 million of cuts to the AIDS drug assistance program. This program serves 35,000 people in California who are either uninsured, underinsured, or uninsurable, and need to take their HIV medications daily in order to survive. Any missed dose of medication can lead to drug resistance, and the medication stops being effective. This ultimately leads to the need for even more expensive medication, or to death.
With this new budget proposal, the governor is quite explicitly proposing to murder 35,000 HIV/AIDS patients by way of withholding their treatment. The cost of an HIV regimen typically starts at about $1,500 per month and most people on ADAP had no other way to pay for it.

The size of the annual California budget deficit is $24 billion. These ADAP cuts represent less than 0.2% of the state deficit. Apparently, there must be some higher priority than California citizens' life in the rest of the budget.

What distinction do these 14 countries share ?

The USA, Brunei, Egypt, Iraq, Yemen, Malaysia, Oman, Qatar, Singapore, Sudan, South Korea, Tunisia, Turks & Caicos Islands and the United Arab Emirates.

Stumped ?

They all still ban foreigners from visiting and migrating specifically on the basis of an HIV-positive status.

And how do they find out who is positive if the person does not declare it, you might ask ? By random bag searches at the borders. Anyone found with their HIV medications, which have to be taken at least once daily without fail, is sent back.