<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?><rss xmlns:atom='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom' xmlns:openSearch='http://a9.com/-/spec/opensearchrss/1.0/' xmlns:georss='http://www.georss.org/georss' version='2.0'><channel><atom:id>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038</atom:id><lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:30:47 +0000</lastBuildDate><title>Julien's random thoughts</title><description></description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/</link><managingEditor>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</managingEditor><generator>Blogger</generator><openSearch:totalResults>58</openSearch:totalResults><openSearch:startIndex>1</openSearch:startIndex><openSearch:itemsPerPage>25</openSearch:itemsPerPage><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-2561811663034570650</guid><pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 05:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-22T21:32:56.130-08:00</atom:updated><title>Gigabyte GA-P35-DS4 Realtek audio vs Gigabyte Dynamic Energy Saver</title><description>I have been using the aforementioned motherboard with an Intel Q6600 CPU for a year and a half in a home theater PC environment. I have been mostly happy until now.&lt;br /&gt;That was before I tried to use the Dynamic Energy Saver (DES) utility program that came with it. This program is supposed to reduce energy consumption. While I haven't tried to measure the savings, I noticed clicks and pops in the losslessly compressed classical music I was playing from iTunes. The SPDIF optical output of the motherboard was connected to my Yamaha RX-V2500 receiver . The Realtek drivers in Windows 7 were configured to output at 24 bits / 192 kHz by default.&lt;br /&gt;Fortunately, the audio problem went away after disabling the DES. But this makes the DES less than useful.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-2561811663034570650?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/gigabyte-ga-p35-ds4-realtek-audio-vs.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-1875611594821549470</guid><pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-17T01:56:48.877-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>scam</category><title>France Télécon Orange / mobicarte fraud</title><description>I spent about 19 years in France. Thus, I should have known better than to walk into an agence France Télécom, 189 avenue Daumesnil, 75012 Paris, on September 8, 2009 to purchase a SIM card with Internet service for my Android cell phone (T-Mobile G1).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sales person sold me service called Mobicarte, for 15 euros, plus a 25 euro "refill" which was needed to activate the "Internet Imax illimitée" option, which cost 12 euros a month. At least that's the name and price of the option that the sales person wrote on the back of my invoice, and told me to activate over the phone.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When I tried to activate this option over the phone, however, I was told it no longer existed as of August 20th. The new rate was 6 euros for daytime, and 3 euros for night time. Or 9 euros per day ! Since I was going to be there for 14 days, that meant the Internet access would cost me 133 euros, instead of the 12 advertised. On top of that, there was the need to constantly reactivate the service. I was not interested in the service at all at this price. I asked for a refund. But I was denied, on the grounds that the Mobicarte had already refilled. This refill had been activated not by me, but by the salesperson, in order to allow the Internet option to be activated. It was "against France Télécom's policy" to provide any refunds for Mobicartes that were already refilled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I spent half an hour arguing with the store manager, Mme "Rochai B", who kept arguing it was not in her power to refund - they can only take money, even though the sales person was clearly in error and not aware of the option change ! She agreed to take back the Mobicarte, and write a letter to corporate to request a refund.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The refund, of course, never came. I was also unable to obtain satisfaction by disputing the France Télécom charge on my credit card with American Express, even though the charge was clearly fraudulent, as to this day, France Télécom is still in possession of the Mobicarte, and still has my money.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If I didn't live all the way in California, I would have taken the store to court. As it is, my only recourse is to share my experience with this very shady company, which is unethical and uses deceptive sales tactics, and warn all its potential customers that France Télécom does not keep their promises, even when they are in writing.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-1875611594821549470?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/france-telecon-orange-mobicarte-fraud.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-4713565290295134050</guid><pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 01:57:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-15T17:57:16.113-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>scam</category><title>Do not call 1-888-333-DISH if you are a Dish network customer</title><description>In my previous blog post, I mentioned a technical issue with my dish network 722 receiver. I accidentally dialed 1-888-333-DISH instead of 1-800-333-DISH, which is Dish Network's actual phone number. The number is actually for a different company. The person who answered the phone never identified which one. I kept asking to be transferred to tech support , but all they wanted to talk about was promotions and upgrading me to a "new HR22 receiver" that would not need to be connected to a phone line, and would have free locals. At no point was it mentioned that this was DirecTV service. I kept asking for the tech support phone number, and in the end they told me to call 1-800-333-DISH - Dish Network's actual phone number. They never mentioned that they were from a different company. Don't be fooled.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-4713565290295134050?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/do-not-call-1-888-333-dish-if-you-are.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-8442710508699956929</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 23:03:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-15T17:49:20.426-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Dish Network VIP 722 receiver vs KQED ATSC signal</title><description>The Echostar VIP 722 receiver is a very nice DVR. It can play and record TV from both over-the-air DTV broadcasts, and from satellite. It has one OTA tuner and two satellite tuners.&lt;br /&gt;One of my most frequently watched channels is PBS, specifically KQED out of San Francisco. The 9.1 subchannel is their HDTV channel.&lt;br /&gt;I have found that on half the broadcasts, the Echostar 722 displays a picture on 9.1, but is unable to decode the sound.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the process of setting up a software DVR on my HTPC, I found that it can decode the same broadcasts, with sound. This is a problem with the 722 DVR.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I filed a report to Dish network tech support and had the issue escalated to their engineering department. I will update this page if I get a response.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-8442710508699956929?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/dish-network-vip-722-receiver-vs-kqed.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-6189618427933102332</guid><pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-14T16:49:19.814-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Logitech Webcam Software trouble under Windows 7</title><description>Earlier this year, I reported my good experience with the Logitech Quickcam Pro 9000 under Windows Vista x64. Unfortunately, after installing Windows 7 x64 (clean install), my experience is no longer good. The application that comes with the camera causes many problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Clicking on "microphone" in LWS causes the application to hang&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Cannot bring up "manage audio devices" in Windows control panel . It never comes up&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;LWS 1.10 installation does not complete (window not responding, hung for hours)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Skype settings window hangs (clicking tools/options in the menu)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Skype won't make calls . An endless dialtone rings even after one tries to terminates the call.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Skype won't exit&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;LWS.EXE cannot be killed from task manager&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;uninstalling the LWS application 12.10.1113 solves all of the above problems.&lt;br /&gt;But of course one can no longer take snapshots without this application installed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;li&gt;Reinstalling the software does not help. All the problems come back. This is with the latest LWS110_x64.exe package.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/OL&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm hoping that Logitech will provide a solution, and I will update this blog if they do, but so far, I have been out of luck. In the meantime, if you have similar problems, and can live without the Logitech Webcam application, uninstalling it may solve your issues.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-6189618427933102332?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/logitech-webcam-software-trouble-under.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>7</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-2617503870780721344</guid><pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 08:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-14T16:50:56.698-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>scam</category><title>Beware of Raidmax Power Supply rebates</title><description>I purchased two power supplies from Raidmax at Fry's Electronics, one in 2008, and another in 2009 . In both cases, there was a large ($40) rebate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the power supplies have worked fine, I was disappointed not to receive the rebates as expected. Both times, I had to call the company to complain 6 months after the purchase, and twice they claimed to have sent me the check many months before, but I never received it. After they remailed the payment, I received the checks I was owed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I track my rebates in a special rebate account in Quicken, which is how I noticed those weren't missing. I have bought items with several thousand dollars worth of rebates in the last few years, mostly from Fry's. Raidmax has been the main offender on unpaid rebates, so I thought it was worth sharing my experience with them.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-2617503870780721344?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/beware-of-raidmax-power-supply-rebates.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-637695722239400354</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-14T16:51:10.793-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>scam</category><title>Comcast Internet raises rates on second month of contract without notice</title><description>I was one of the early adopters of DSL, during the Pacbell trial in November 1997 . But SBC, and now AT&amp;amp;T, didn't invest enough into their network. I was running the top ADSL speed available through AT&amp;amp;T, which was only 6 Mbits/s down / 768 kbps up. The upstream speed was particularly painful.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In September, I placed an order with Comcast, because they offered 12 Mbits/s down and 2 Mbps up, and there was a 12 months promotion at $24.99, plus $3 for a modem rental, or $27.99.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Comcast service took longer than expected, because I hadn't had any kind of cable service in my home since I purchased it in 1997. There was a 10 day delay due to construction to run a new cable line from the street into the junction box.&lt;br /&gt;Finally, the service was installed successfully on October 2, and so far, it has worked relatively well. My first October bill was for $27.99 plus tax.&lt;br /&gt;Then came my second November bill. It was for $29.99 plus tax ! Imagine my surprise at this rate hike, having just started a new 12 months promotion.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I called Comcast about this problem. They claimed that only the Internet service was on a contract, but not the cost of the modem rental. It went up from $3 to $5, so I was told. I hadn't received any notice about this whatsoever. I was told that notices were mailed. I am very meticulous about my postal mail, and I know for certain I never received it. It is probably because I was such a new customer and the notices must have been mailed before I was a customer. In other words, I fell through the cracks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The only thing I was able to get Comcast to accomplish was to refund me $2 for the modem overcharge for November, since I had no notice. But I'm supposed to pay $5/month for the modem rental from December on.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I already have a used identical Motorola SB5100 cable modem on order on ebay for $26.99 including shipping, which is $2.69/month for the next 10 months, vs $3/month for the Comcast rental. I will return Comcast's rented modem before the December bill is due.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the 12 months contract with Comcast is up, Comcast will want to charge me for basic cable TV service, for which I have no use for, since I use a combination of satellite and OTA antenna for my TV. I don't even have a cable outlet in my living room. I had the Comcast installer run the cable line from directly to my home office upstairs. I have a feeling that I will be getting rid of the Motorola cable modem on October 2, 2010, and hopefully switching to ADSL2/2+, if a local telco operator has upgraded their network by then.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-637695722239400354?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/comcast-internet-raises-rates-on-2nd.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-8853255131186442276</guid><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 00:41:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-14T16:51:23.425-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Migrating Yahoo messenger chat archives manually</title><description>One thing that the Yahoo messenger program is missing is the ability to import or export chat archives. This can become fairly important if you have a lot of people in your buddy list, as I do over 700. The problem manifests itself when you do a full reinstallation of your Windows operating system, as may sometimes be required. Or if you are migrating from, say, Windows Vista to Windows 7, you may not want to do the in-place upgrade, but instead to a "fresh" install of the OS.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In this example, the system was previously running Windows Vista 32 bits. The archive files were located in :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;C:\Windows.old\Users\atoy\Local Settings\VirtualStore\Program Files\Yahoo!\Messenger\Profiles\atoyccb\Archive\Messages&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A new OS, Vista 64 bits, was installed. The new archived messages are now in&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;C:\Users\Charito\AppData\Local\VirtualStore\Program Files (x86)\Yahoo!\Messenger\Profiles\atoyccb\Archive\Messages&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You can copy the old archives over by following the following steps :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;ul&gt;&lt;li&gt;Open a command-prompt window as administrator&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;li&gt;Copy over the old archives to the new location :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;XCOPY "C:\Windows.old\Users\atoy\Local Settings\VirtualStore\Program Files\Yahoo!\Messenger\Profiles\atoyccb\Archive\Messages\*.*" "&amp;gt;C:\Users\Charito\AppData\Local\VirtualStore\Program Files (x86)\Yahoo!\Messenger\Profiles\atoyccb\Archive\Messages" /S&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-8853255131186442276?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/11/migrating-yahoo-messenger-chat-archives.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-4980247622543446784</guid><pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 08:04:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-11-14T16:51:37.435-08:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>A better solution to a programming book's linked list problem</title><description>As astute readers of my blog know, I left my job at &lt;a href="http://www.sun.com/"&gt;Sun&lt;/a&gt; last month. After taking some well-deserved time off, I have been looking for something new.&lt;br /&gt;Despite 14 years professional experience, 20 years coding experience, and a &lt;a href="http://www.madbrain.com/cv.html"&gt;lengthy résumé&lt;/a&gt;, I was stumped by some coding puzzles at a couple of &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/"&gt;large&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href="http://www.yahoo.com/"&gt;companies&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;So, last monday, I picked up a book at Barnes &amp;amp; Noble titled &lt;a href="http://www.piexposed.com"&gt;"Programming Interviews Exposed, 2nd edition"&lt;/a&gt;, to help get past the torture tests I have to endure in this tight job market. I have been reading it as a leisurely pace, trying to find the problems first on my own, before checking the solution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am writing this article and reprinting the problem with the author's permission.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On page 31, the author defines a typical linked-list structure :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;typedef struct Element {&lt;br /&gt;    struct Element *next;&lt;br /&gt;    void *data;&lt;br /&gt;} Element;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After some fairly basic coding discussion of linked lists, a slightly more complicated problem appears on page 35.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;b&gt;head&lt;/b&gt; and &lt;b&gt;tail&lt;/b&gt; are global pointers to the first and last element, respectively, of a singly-linked list of integers. Implement a C function for the following prototype :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;b&gt;bool remove(Element *elem);&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The argument to &lt;b&gt;remove&lt;/b&gt; is the element to be deleted.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The authors spend much of pages 36-38 discussing that the problem is mostly about&lt;br /&gt;"special cases", in particular when deleting elements at the beginning or the end of the list.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The author's final solution reads as follows :&lt;br /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;pre&gt;bool remove(Element* elem) { &lt;br /&gt;    Element* curPos = &amp;amp;head;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    if (!elem)&lt;br /&gt;        return false;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    if (elem == head) {&lt;br /&gt;        head = elem-&amp;gt;next;&lt;br /&gt;            delete elem;&lt;br /&gt;        /* special case for 1 element list */&lt;br /&gt;        if (!head)&lt;br /&gt;            tail = NULL;&lt;br /&gt;        return true;&lt;br /&gt;    }&lt;br /&gt;    while (curPos)  {&lt;br /&gt;        if (curPos-&amp;gt;next == elem) {&lt;br /&gt;            curPos-&amp;gt;next = elem-&amp;gt;next;&lt;br /&gt;            delete elem;&lt;br /&gt;            if (curPos-&amp;gt;next == NULL)&lt;br /&gt;                tail = curPos;&lt;br /&gt;            return true;&lt;br /&gt;        }&lt;br /&gt;        curPos = curPos-&amp;gt;next;&lt;br /&gt;    }&lt;br /&gt;    return false;&lt;br /&gt;}&lt;/pre&gt;&lt;pre&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/pre&gt;While my first inclination was to also have a special case, I quickly stroke that part out on paper. I think the code really does not have to be so long if you use a double pointer to refer to the&lt;br /&gt;head. This eliminates the first special case for updating the head pointer when removing the first element. And therefore, there is no longer a need to update the tail pointer in two different places, which further reduces code size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;pre&gt;bool remove(Element* elem) {&lt;br /&gt;    Element** curPos = &amp;amp;head;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    if (!elem)&lt;br /&gt;        return false;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;    while (*curPos) {&lt;br /&gt;        if (elem == *curPos) {&lt;br /&gt;            *curPos = elem-&amp;gt;next;&lt;br /&gt;            if (elem == tail)&lt;br /&gt;                tail = elem-&amp;gt;next;&lt;br /&gt;            delete(elem);&lt;br /&gt;            return true;&lt;br /&gt;        }&lt;br /&gt;        curPos = &amp;amp;((*curPos)-&amp;gt;next);&lt;br /&gt;    }&lt;br /&gt;    return false;&lt;br /&gt;}&lt;/pre&gt;The only thing I changed from my piece of paper was the name of the temporary variable, and the formatting, to match that of the book's authors.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-4980247622543446784?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/10/linked-list-problem.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-756441564550096264</guid><pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 00:50:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:01:58.367-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hiv</category><title>Better not get sick at Netflix !</title><description>This post is more than 2 years overdue, but I felt that my story needed to be heard, especially by past, current and prospective Netflix employees, as well as management.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the summer of 2006, I was looking for a new position and ended up interviewing and landing what I thought was a great opportunity at Netflix working on security in the Electronic Delivery Systems group, and with a hefty paycheck. My first day was October 31, 2006.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, on November 1, my second day there, I got very bad news from my physician : my HIV test, performed the week before, had turned positive. This was of course devastating news. I became severely depressed, and was not able to make it to work on my third or fourth day. I missed plenty more work time. My boyfriend also turned out HIV positive 2 weeks after I did. I will be the first to admit that I was completely ineffective at my job for the next 2 months. Learning both about this new major disease and a new very challenging job at the same time simply was more than I could chew.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, in January of 2007, I went on short-term disability for the depression and ended up in IOP at Kaiser. I was covered under Netflix's generous disability policies. After 1 month, I had still not been released back to work, and received a letter with an ultimatum to return to work by mid-february, 6 weeks after the start of my disability, or be terminated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Unfortunately, I was ineligible for an FMLA, a Family Medical Leave of Absence, which would have allowed me to take 3 months medical leave, because I was a recent hire, and the law only covers those with at least 1 year of service.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One week before the ultimatum, I pleaded my case with Netflix HR, explaining the reason for my absenteism and disability. This did not make any difference. I was told that it was standard company policy for this situation - to terminate the new employee who had an extended illness ! The date passed, and I was terminated while still on disability. That was the first and only time I had ever been involuntarily terminated. No severance of any kind was offered. I was now both HIV positive, and jobless.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was released by my doctor to work again about a month after my termination, and returned to my previous employer, Sun Microsystems, another month later, working 60% (3 days a week) for the remainder of 2007, and then back to full time in 2008.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As I write this post, I am enjoying some much-needed time off, having  left Sun out of disinterest in September in the wake of the acquisition of Sun by Oracle, and seeking another opportunity. Few Silicon Valley companies are hiring at this time. But I noticed that Netflix was, and my old position still had not been filled. I inquired with my former manager at Netflix, who was aware of the details of the situation. I was told that per Netflix company policy, there are no second chances there - once you are fired from Netflix, you can never apply there again.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The moral of the story is this : make sure you don't get seriously sick if you want to work for Netflix, especially in your first year.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-756441564550096264?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/10/better-not-get-sick-at-netflix.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-7037717526961235805</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:44:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:05:53.931-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Windows 7 vs Fedora Core 11, and Linux in general</title><description>This year, my father also wanted to upgrade his computer, as did my mother. I had a shop build one with the exact same parts. I imaged my mother's computer drive with Acronis, and imaged it back to my father's computer. So far so good. But I had installed Windows 7 with its default setting, which creates two partitions - a "recovery partition", which was about 100 MB, and a regular Windows 7 NTFS partition, which was about 931 GB.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;My father has been a Linux user for a very long time, and only desired Windows for very occasional use. In the past, it was fairly easy to dual-boot Windows &amp;amp; Linux. Not so this time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;First, I had to shrink the Windows NTFS partition using the "shrink" tool. But this didn't work. There were a variety of unmovable system files towards the end apparently. Even after defragmenting the drive, the shrink feature of the Windows disk manager could only reduce the drive by a measly 300 MB ! The solution was very complicated : I erased all the partitions, reinstalled Windows 7 with a small partitions, and then re-restored my mother's computers into the small partition from my backup drive using Acronis True Image 2009. Now, I had a working Windows 7 installation, and some free unpartitioned space.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The next 3 days were spent trying to install various versions of Linux, mostly Fedora Core 11 64 bits, as well as Ubuntu 8.x.  This was always unsuccessful. Typically, the Fedora installation program just crashed with exceptions. Just hours before I was supposed to leave, I got the idea to delete the 100 MB Windows 7 recovery partition. I then restored its content from the Acronis backup onto the large Windows partition, and booted with the DFSEE tool to make the Windows 7 partition active. But Windows 7 still didn't boot correctly. I then booted the Windows 7 DVD and used the recovery option. Amazingly, that worked. I now had a single 212 GB NTFS Windows 7 partition that was booting. After that, the Fedora Core 11 installation proceeded like a breeze.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moral of the story : if you want to dual-boot Windows 7 and Linux - do not let the Windows 7 installer create the recovery partition when you get prompted to let Windows create additional partitions. Just say no !&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-7037717526961235805?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/09/windows-7-vs-fedora-core-11-and-linux.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>6</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-2031748485733490971</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:32:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:06:03.318-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Windows 7 vs LSI Logic 53C1030 Ultra160 SCSI controller</title><description>I have been using SCSI controllers in one form or another in some of my PCs for over 15 years.  At this time, I have only a couple of SCSI devices left - one 36 GB hard drive made by Seagate that spins at 15,000 rpm, and a DAT DDS-4 tape drive made by HP. The last SCSI controller I bought was purchased in 2001 and is based on the 53C1010 Ultra160 SCSI chipset by LSI Logic, formerly Symbios, formerly AT&amp;amp;T, formerly NCR. This chipset worked wonderfully under a variety of operating systems, from OS/2 up to and including Windows Vista x64.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Enter Windows 7. Earlier this wednesday, I attempted to migrate the system containing this SCSI controller from Windows Vista x64 to Windows 7 x64. I was told that there was no driver for Windows 7 for the controller. This was quite disappointing, after 8 years of loyal services. I disabled the device in the device manager, and proceeded with the installation of Windows 7 anyway.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the time of this writing, I have been unable to locate a proper driver for this controller under Windows 7 x64. This means the OS can no longer see my two SCSI devices. I don't care much about Windows no longer seeing the DDS-4 tape drive as I wasn't using it under Windows. But I am bothered by no longer seeing the SCSI hard drive, which still contains a bootable copy of OS/2 Warp Server for E-Business SMP. While that SCSI hard drive is formatted as HPFS, and can therefore not be mounted under Windows 7, it could still be imaged and backed up with Acronis True Image Home, at least under Windows Vista back when the SCSI controller worked. I may end up going back to Windows Vista on this system if I can't resolve this issue. Or I might move my OS/2 installation to another drive.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-2031748485733490971?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/09/windows-7-vs-lsi-logic-53c1030-ultra160.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>1</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-6277407449701308171</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:29:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-25T00:14:18.543-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Windows 7 vs Kaspersky Anti-virus 2009</title><description>I recently acquired the above anti-virus for the low of sum of "FAR" (free-after-rebate), ie. I only paid the sales tax on it. This is a good program that performs well under Vista x64.&lt;br /&gt;When I attempted an upgrade of one of my computers to Windows 7 RTM (final version), the installation program instructed me that KAV was incompatible with Windows 7. I was forced to uninstall it before proceeding with the upgrade to Windows 7. At the time of this writing, Kaspersky only has a beta program for Windows 7. I hope they will issue fixes soon, as Windows 7 final version has been available to developers for a month.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-6277407449701308171?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/09/windows-7-vs-kaspersky-anti-virus-2009.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-7064622264362446083</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-25T00:14:31.173-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Windows 7 vs Acronis True Image Home 2009</title><description>For the last 6 months or so, I ahve been using the excellent Acronis True Image Home 2009 software to image the hard disks of several home computers under Windows Vista x64. During a recent trip to France, I traveled with a hard drive containing a drive image so I could get to all my files.&lt;br /&gt;To my dismay, I found that I was not able to fully access the data under Windows 7 (RTM, ie. final version). True Image Home 2009 still has some issues under it. Specifically, at the time of this writing, it's unable to mount drives from the backup archive as local drive letters under Windows 7. All is not lost, since the restore feature of True Image still works. However, it takes much longer. I wanted to mount the drive to use the command-line XCOPY program to only copy certain types of files from the archive. Unfortunately, the True Image Restore feature is limited, and does not allow such file filters. I ended up having to restore a full directory, and then deleting all the unwanted files, which took much longer - in fact about 4 more hours than it should have.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Let's hope that Acronis will issue a patch for True Image 2009 to fix the drive mounting issue under Windows 7.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-7064622264362446083?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/09/windows-7-vs-acronis-true-image-home.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-4048514168346973882</guid><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:23:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:06:20.719-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Video memory setting in VirtualBox with 30" monitor</title><description>In recent months, I have been running Sun's Virtualbox software to run multiple guest operating systems. One of my two monitors is an HP LP3065 30" LCD, which has a 2560x1600 resolution (4 million pixels).&lt;br /&gt;Virtualbox has a very nice feature which allows the desktop to be resized up to the host's resolution. In theory. When I tried to use the feature, I noticed that the guest couldn't be maximized. The reason turned out to be that the default video memory in Virtualbox was insufficient. 2560x1600 at 32 bit color depth requires 16384000 bytes of video memory. Once I increased the video memory to 16MB, I was able to maximize the guest OS window to fill up the entire screen.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-4048514168346973882?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/09/video-memory-setting-in-virtualbox-with.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-380625349431103467</guid><pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 22:34:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-09-23T15:42:31.986-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Windows 7 ATI HDMI audio vs digital coax audio issue</title><description>A few weeks ago, I was in France. I took advantage of the occasion to upgrade my mother's computer to much more recent hardware, as well as her television to a new 46" LG LCD HDTV. The PC was setup with the final version of Windows 7 x64.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She kept her old PC monitor, a 15" LG LCD, with only a VGA connection, as well as her old Yamaha RX-V420RDS amplifier, which long predated HDMI.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PC sported a Sapphire video card with an ATI Radeon HD4850 chipset and dual DVI outputs. One output went to the 15" LCD with a DVI-&gt;VGA adapter, and the other went to the TV with a DVI-&gt;HDMI adapter and a 15m HDMI cable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The PC audio was connected to the digital coaxial input Yamaha amp via a 15m coaxial cable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After I taught her how to switch back &amp;amp; forth between her 2 displays in Windows 7, my mother noticed a very odd problem : when she was using the TV as her display, all sound disappeared ! But when she switched back to the 15" analog VGA LCD, it came back. I was unable to debug the issue for her over the phone. But I still had some more time before flying back home, and determined the root cause of the problem in person : Windows 7 had seen it fit to automatically redirect all audio to the HDMI output of the video card when the display was switch to the TV !&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This was of course not what was desired for her setup. The TV's audio was muted and we had no intention of using its built-in speakers. We wanted the audio to always stay on the digital coax output hooked up to the Yamaha amplifier . I fixed this in the Control Panel by disabling the ATI HDMI audio output device. I hope this will help someone else running into the same issue of lost sound when switching displays.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-380625349431103467?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/09/windows-7-ati-hdmi-audio-vs-digital.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-7495908457800760002</guid><pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-08-10T13:05:12.208-07:00</atom:updated><title>Amazon reviews</title><description>A little over a year ago, I purchased an expensive Panasonic LM-BE50DE dual-layer rewritable Blu-ray disc. This 50 GB media cost me $50 from Amazon. It worked fine, so I posted a positive review, which has since received 3 helpful votes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A year later, the disc has failed. And Panasonic won't replace it because they only have a 90 days warranty on parts, which includes media !&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I attempted to change my Amazon review's star rating down from 4 stars to 1 star.  But it was impossible. I could only change the headline and text of the review, but not the star rating. I called Amazon about this, and was told that this could only be done within 30 days of a review ! I think that makes Amazon reviews significantly less helpful if long-term owners of a product cannot update their reviews when they later encounter problems with them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To be fair to Amazon, it appears that it's possible to delete the review, and post it again. I haven't tried that. But doing so would void the helpful votes that my original review received.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-7495908457800760002?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/08/amazon-reviews.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-1027624011369829243</guid><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:06:34.430-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>bugs</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Annoying Cubase license scheme</title><description>Last week, I bought a pair of &lt;a href="http://www.yamahasynth.com/products/midi_controllers/kx/"&gt;Yamaha KX61&lt;/a&gt; keyboards to replace a broken organ. They came with a limited version of &lt;a href="http://www.steinberg.net/en/products/musicproduction/cubase5_product.html"&gt;Cubase software&lt;/a&gt;, called Cubase AI. Unfortunately, the software refused to install on my Vista 64 box, crashing in the annoying license checker scheme. The exact error message was &lt;b&gt;&lt;i&gt;Syncrosoft Protected Object Server has stopped working&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;i&gt;&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After much research, I found the solution to this problem :&lt;br /&gt;1. Disable DEP in Control Panel/System/Advanced/DEP&lt;br /&gt;2. Reboot the computer&lt;br /&gt;3. Reinstall Cubase&lt;br /&gt;4. Re-enable DEP, with the exception of the SYNSOPOS.EXE program., which lives in the C:\Program Files (x86)\Syncrosoft\POS on my system, but might be in C:\Program Files\Syncrosoft\POS for those with 32-bit systems.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-1027624011369829243?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/08/annoying-cubase-license-scheme.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>2</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-1313048035098678461</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 22:00:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:05:10.536-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>music</category><title>Invention 1 in C major, BWV 772</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;object height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;param value="http://youtube.com/v/Lb33S5Q4eBo" name="movie"&gt;&lt;embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://youtube.com/v/Lb33S5Q4eBo" height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-1313048035098678461?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/07/invention-1-in-c-major-bwv-772.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-3058685406187792319</guid><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 21:59:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:04:37.004-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>music</category><title>Prelude in C Major, WTC Book 1, BWV 846</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;object height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;param value="http://youtube.com/v/TqsqZJtzhcg" name="movie"&gt;&lt;embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://youtube.com/v/TqsqZJtzhcg" height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-3058685406187792319?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/07/prelude-in-c-major-wtc-book-1-bwv-846.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-3694819619690500240</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:04:47.720-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>music</category><title>Goldberg Variations BWV 988, Variation 10</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;object height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;param value="http://youtube.com/v/5pKchbIblbw" name="movie"&gt;&lt;embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://youtube.com/v/5pKchbIblbw" height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-3694819619690500240?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/07/goldberg-variations-bwv-988-variation_02.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-185821611252458117</guid><pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 11:06:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-10-20T11:04:55.796-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>music</category><title>Goldberg Variations BWV 988, Variation 25</title><description>&lt;div xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;object height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;param value="http://youtube.com/v/GqJCrL0igdE" name="movie"&gt;&lt;embed type="application/x-shockwave-flash" src="http://youtube.com/v/GqJCrL0igdE" height="350" width="425"&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-185821611252458117?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/07/goldberg-variations-bwv-988-variation.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-1852212453938557326</guid><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:27:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-25T18:58:07.718-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gay rights</category><title>Obama putting gays back in the closet</title><description>After making strong promises to the gay community on national television, such as the repeal of the military &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don%27t_ask_don%27t_tell"&gt;Don't ask don't tell policy&lt;/a&gt;, and the repeal of the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defense_of_Marriage_Act"&gt;Defense of marriage act&lt;/a&gt; which he once called &lt;a href="http://www.hrc.org/12905.htm"&gt;abhorrent&lt;/a&gt;, and getting elected on those promises, Barack Obama now no longer wants to say anything on the subject matter. Except in private, &lt;a href="http://www.queerty.com/what-did-house-democrats-secret-gay-rights-meeting-accomplish-20090625/"&gt;secret meetings&lt;/a&gt;. In other words, he would much rather have us keep quiet, in the closet. Those times have passed, mister President.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-1852212453938557326?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/06/obama-putting-gays-back-in-closet.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-2842103417113176207</guid><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:45:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-25T18:58:22.381-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>tech</category><title>Naked DSL and Cable Internet without TV</title><description>These days, I make most of my telephone calls either from my (pricey) cell phone, or over the Internet. I have little need for my landline telephone line. Except I'm forced to pay for it because it is required to have DSL service with my current &lt;a href="http://www.rawbw.com/"&gt;Internet service provider&lt;/a&gt;. The service runs over AT&amp;amp;T landlines. While AT&amp;amp;T has made "naked DSL" available to its customers, this only applies to those who subscribe to the AT&amp;amp;T internet service. Not to other internet services running on the AT&amp;amp;T cicruits. So, I'm subscribing to a $7.28 measured rate service. To which $6.88 of various taxes and fees are added, for a total of $14.16. For a service that I don't want or need. For over 7 years. This should be against the law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lately, I have been thinking about switching over to cable internet, because much higher download and upload speeds are available. However, once again, one is forced to purchase unwanted basic cable TV service when ordering cable internet from Comcast. I get my TV service by satellite and over the air, and have no use for cable TV. It appears that Comcast is now relaxing this requirement to purchase basic cable, but only for one of the lower speeds, and for a temporary introductory period of 6 to 12 months. After that, the monthly rate more than doubles, due primarily to the extra added cost of the unnecessary basic cable TV service. Once again, this bundling of service should be against the law.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-2842103417113176207?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/06/naked-dsl-and-cable-internet-without-tv.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item><item><guid isPermaLink='false'>tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3389188234883785038.post-5673502658454596899</guid><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:55:00 +0000</pubDate><atom:updated>2009-06-25T18:59:43.078-07:00</atom:updated><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>hiv</category><category domain='http://www.blogger.com/atom/ns#'>gay rights</category><title>Murder by the state : people with HIV to be terminated in California</title><description>The &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arnold_Schwarzenegger"&gt;governator&lt;/a&gt;'s proposed California budget includes $55 million of cuts to the &lt;a href="http://www.cdph.ca.gov/programs/aids/Pages/Default.aspx"&gt;AIDS drug assistance program&lt;/a&gt;. This program serves 35,000 people in California who are either uninsured, underinsured, or uninsurable, and need to take their HIV medications daily in order to survive. Any missed dose of medication can lead to drug resistance, and the medication stops being effective. This ultimately leads to the need for even more expensive medication, or to death.&lt;br /&gt;With this new budget proposal, the governor is quite explicitly proposing to murder 35,000 HIV/AIDS  patients by way of withholding their treatment. The cost of an HIV regimen typically starts at about $1,500 per month and most people on ADAP had no other way to pay for it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The size of the annual California budget deficit is $24 billion. These ADAP cuts represent less than 0.2% of the state deficit. Apparently, there must be some higher priority than California citizens' life in the rest of the budget.&lt;div class="blogger-post-footer"&gt;&lt;img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/3389188234883785038-5673502658454596899?l=www.madbrain.com%2Fblog' alt='' /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description><link>http://www.madbrain.com/blog/2009/06/murder-by-state-people-with-hiv-to-be.html</link><author>noreply@blogger.com (Julien Pierre)</author><thr:total xmlns:thr='http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0'>0</thr:total></item></channel></rss>